Request for Adminship (RFA) within Wikipedia: How Do User Contributions Instill Community Trust?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Research into user driven communities such as Wikipedia often focuses on community level characteristics, paying less attention to social processes performed within those communities. One important process is determining trust of community members. In Wikipedia, the access to specific tools requiring trust is determined through a community voting process known as request for adminship (RFA). In this study, we examine the impact of different forms of contribution made by adminship candidates on the community's overall decision as to whether to promote the candidate to administrator. To do so, we collected data on 754 RFA cases and used logistic regression to test four hypotheses. Our results supported the role of total contribution, and clarification of contribution in RFA success while the impacts of social contribution was partially supported and the role of content contribution was not supported. Also, both control variables (tenure and number of attempts) showed significant relationships with RFA success.
منابع مشابه
Uncovering the Social Dynamics of Online Elections
Past work analysing elections in online domains has largely ignored the underlying social networks present in such environments. Here, the Wikipedia Request for Adminship (RfA) process is studied within the context of a social network and several factors influencing different stages of the voting process are pinpointed. Machine-learning problems were formulated to test the identified factors. T...
متن کاملExplizite Neutralität in Wählernetzwerken - Eine Analyse der Requests for Adminship (RfAs) in Wikipedia
Dieses Papier untersucht „Requests for Adminship (RfA)” in Wikipedia. RfAs sind Wahlen in Wikipedia, durch die Autoren zusätzliche technische Features erhalten können, die sie bei der Bearbeitung von Wikipedia unterstützen. Insbesondere beantworten wir die Forschungsfrage, was die Wahrscheinlichkeit erhöht, dass jemand eine neutrale Stimme gegenüber einem potentiellen Administrator abgibt. Zur ...
متن کاملContributing to Wikipedia: Through Content or Social Interaction?
While the overall amount of user contributions in various namespaces has been discussed in previous research, the question of how and where users contribute, depending on their time spent in Wikipedia, is still open. This study analyzed contribution patterns in three namespaces of 685,897 active users of English Wikipedia since its inception. User editing behaviors were analyzed according to th...
متن کاملInvestigations into Trust for Collaborative Information Repositories: A Wikipedia Case Study
As collaborative repositories grow in popularity and use, issues concerning the quality and trustworthiness of information grow. Some current popular repositories contain contributions from a wide variety of users, many of which will be unknown to a potential end user. Additionally the content may change rapidly and information that was previously contributed by a known user may be updated by a...
متن کاملPushing Your Point of View: Behavioral Measures of Manipulation in Wikipedia
As a major source for information on virtually any topic, Wikipedia serves an important role in public dissemination and consumption of knowledge. As a result, it presents tremendous potential for people to promulgate their own points of view; such efforts may be more subtle than typical vandalism. In this paper, we introduce new behavioral metrics to quantify the level of controversy associate...
متن کامل